I’m staring at my typewriter. One of the most difficult
things about writing a story is what to put in and what to leave out. I’m
currently putting the finishing touches to a new edition of Neville Changes Villages but I’m struggling
with the beginning. I want to add an extra scene which has Neville Palmer standing
on a street corner in fifties’ London, posing in his Teddy Boy finery and
contemplating the drab
surroundings. The
scene is deliberately ambiguous. At first we’re not sure if he’s actually in
the fifties, remembering or simply imagining it. Neville’s inner psychological
world is an oddball mix of past and present and I want the reader to experience
this.
Trouble is that before this scene I’ve already put things in
to introduce Neville and explain a little about Teddy Boys. There is an extract from a newspaper in 1951
and a school letter in 1975. The first is a pompous, strident editorial about
the dangers of Teddy Boys and the second from a headmaster explaining why
Neville has been excluded again.
So now I’m wondering whether having the two extracts plus the new scene (and there’s a frame narrative) could slow the novel down. Then last
night I thumbed through Charles Drazin’s superb book on the British noir
classic The Third Man. He describes
how the director Carol Reed and his assistant Guy Hamilton discussed the reels
of beautiful,
So here I am staring at that typewriter, still trying to
decide what to do with the street scene. Keeping it in might clutter up the
beginning and get in the way of telling the story. On the other hand, the
reader might really enjoy an entertaining introduction to the main character. Does
the story demand I go straight from A to C or should I keep the scene?
Eventually I come to a decision and get to work on the manuscript.
The clackety-clack sound of typewriter keys fills my office.
The new edition of Neville
Changes Villages will be out soon.
Acknowledgments:
In Search of The Third Man, Charles Drazin